Corazon Aquino (1933-2009)

This blog takes pause to mark the passing of a former Filipino President, the Seventh President of the Philippine Republic, the lady in yellow, the unexpected heroine who brought down a corrupt, overstaying, and much hated dictatorship.  She came to power on a wave of massive popular support goodwill, domestic and international.  She had the mandate to reform a system that had grown hopelessly corrupt, dysfunctional, and worse, criminal.

I wish I could say more positive things about her but in good conscience I can’t.  23 years after our people kicked the Marcoses out, we all can certainly say that things haven’t turned out for the better.  The country remains polarized, the political system and government bureaucracy remain highly corrupt, brain drain has gotten much worse, economic opportunities remain limited or non-existent for millions of Filipinos, and millions of lives remain mired in poverty.

I did not agree with her on a number of issues such as the ineffectual agrarian reform law she and her Congress passed; the decision to junk the 1935 Constitution that led to a multi-party political system that has become mired in endless gridlock; , the way she let her closeness to the Church influence some of her political decisions; and to scrap any program that was associated with her predecessor without regard to the benefits it bore.  I also did not agree with the very weak hand she displayed towards elements of both the extreme left and extreme right.

Although she led a revolution, Cory Aquino was no revolutionary.  She came from a family of oligarchs and she pretty much preserved the system that fed and sustained such oligarchy.  By bringing the Marcos dictatorship down, she simply destroyed a new, crony and military-supported oligarchy to reinstate the old landowner-dominated form that enriched and empowered her clan and others like hers.  A lot of the faces and family names of people in her administration reflected the return of the old order.

Like millions of Filipinos, I had high hopes that February day in 1986 when Mrs. Aquino took her oath of office.  I had hoped then that with Marcos out of the way, the Philippines could get back on the road to economic development.  I had hoped that the people who had plundered the country for 20 years will be brought to justice.  I had hoped that in spite of my country’s imperfections, there were enough very good men and women among us who could help lift the nation out of its economic misery.   But as I found out later on, intelligence, good intentions, and a willingness to serve are not enough.

My idealistic and naive mind didn’t realize then that there was a much bigger hurdle to overcome in order for the country to gain a place among the world’s prosperous nations.  That hurdle was, and still is, the inability of Filipinos to unite and set aside their differences in order to achieve a higher and greater good.  A lot of cause-oriented groups and political parties sprung out of the new political system created by the 1987 Constitution.  All these groups had noble goals and were led and supported by smart and gifted people with a genuine concern for the country’s future.  I do not question their patriotism and I do not question their sincerity.   And I will not go into any more details as to what happened or did not happen.  But our system has failed to deliver because of the failure of these groups and parties to reach a middle ground somewhere, to compromise some of their faction’s ideals for the sake of a higher, more unifying national goal.

Mrs. Aquino had, for a brief shining moment, the opportunity to unite a tired, frustrated and weary nation.  But in my humble opinion, the inability to think and rise above her oligarchic comfort zone, coupled with her own failure to compromise with both pro-administration and opposition groups in order to foster a more united nation made her miss out on such a golden opportunity.

23 Responses to “Corazon Aquino (1933-2009)”

  1. aLiNe Says:

    too many good and prominent people dying these days…

  2. Andy Says:

    I didn’t even bother praying for her. Swear to god, I’m going straight to hell when I die. Ehehe.

    • panaderos Says:

      Andy,

      She will get praises and accolades from a lot of people no doubt. But I am saddened more by the thought that the dreams of millions of our countrymen remain unfulfilled to this day. The country has remained politically unstable and our political institutions remain weak. If both were strong enough, there wouldn’t have been a need for an EDSA DOS. EDSA DOS was a reflection of the failure of our political institutions to adequately deal with a corruption case.

      Don’t worry about going to hell, Pards. A lot of us will be there. :)

  3. ever Says:

    pinalipad sa hangin ang kulay dilaw na pagdadalamhati at pakikiramay!

  4. cza Says:

    Too many yellow ribbons along the roads nowadays. Lahat ng news about Cory. She lived a good life, I guess it was her time to go.. :)

    • panaderos Says:

      Cza,

      Maybe I was a bit harsh with what I wrote but I just wanted to voice a frustration I have with our society as a whole. I don’t mean to be pessimistic as well about the future but a lot of times, we have failed to move forward by focusing too much on what we disagree on rather than on things we agree about.

      Given the circumstances, I guess you’re right in that she lived a good life. She led the country in the best way she knew how.

  5. snglguy Says:

    Like you, I had high hopes after EDSA 86. But I became disillusioned as everything slowly unraveled. I realized that nothing has changed, we’re still on the same rickety carriage, but with a different set of drivers, more rapacious than the last.

    • panaderos Says:

      Snglguy,

      I disliked the way certain politicians were publicly smeared simply because their views were not in line with those of her closest advisers, especially those advisers whose views leaned too far to the left. Those guys did a very good job of character assassination because the politicians affected were never able to recover their reputations. A number of those politicos have died without getting the chance to clear their names.

  6. katcarneo Says:

    The only things I know about Cory are the things in the textbooks, all of them speaking of her as a great leader. You gave me a lot to think (and research) about.

    • panaderos Says:

      Kat,

      Please don’t get me wrong. I don’t harbor any hatred towards her. It’s difficult governing an unruly nation and she tried her best under tough circumstances.

  7. rdl Says:

    Too bad!!
    just watched anthony bourgoyne in the phillipines and made me want to go there.

    • panaderos Says:

      RDL,

      I love my home country. It’s a great place to visit because of the people and its natural beauty. I’m just lamenting the fact that our political leaders have spent and wasted too much time bickering and emphasizing their differences instead of working for the country’s continued development.

      Mrs. Aquino was a fine person. However, she let herself be swayed by advisers who did not always have the country’s best interests at heart.

  8. mari Says:

    My condolences to the Aquinos.

    Nothing much has changed after the EDSA revolution. Same old politicking in the government. The poor are still poor and the rich are still rich. Those who have the means leave pinas find better opportunities elsewhere.

    • panaderos Says:

      Mari,

      The sad thing is that things have gotten so bad that even the poor themselves have started to leave the country in droves. They have shown extreme willingness to mortgage any possession they have of material significance in order to land a job in a foreign land.

      This wasn’t the situation before but it is now. That’s not what we could call an improvement.

  9. luna miranda Says:

    Cory was certainly not a perfect leader, she had too many shortcomings. But her sincerity and love for the Philippines made her distinct from other presidents. She could have refused to run in the 1986 snap elections, hired mercenaries to destroy Ninoy’s killers and returned to the US and lived the life she wanted.

    I’m afraid I don’t have the comfort of blaming our leaders in what’s happening here. As citizens, we are equally responsible…we vote the wrong people, we easily forget, we get complacent, we tolerate dishonesty, we are stuck in the old ways of doing things—maglalagay sa city hall, sa traffic aide; nandadaya ng income tax, etc. We want the government to change, kaso tayo mismo ayaw magbago.

    I admired Cory because she did something, she did the right thing even when it was difficult. Unlike a lot of Pinoys who don’t make a stand—magaling na critic pero laging neutral.

    • panaderos Says:

      Miranda,

      I agree with you that there is definitely a lot of blame to go around. People expect the government to provide services and yet, they (the people) refuse to pay their fair share of the taxes needed to fund such services. We vote a corrupt politician into office simply because the politician is personally known to us or helped a relative. On the political front, a lot of our political groups and cause-oriented groups have the mentality that theirs is the only cause that’s right. Everyone else is wrong.

      We can’t move forward as a nation if we have a low tolerance for dissent. The debates/discussions of our nation’s problems need to be elevated to a civilized level in order for us to truly progress. Let us be ready to debate ideas and we should also be ready to accept the decision of the majority. We will never be able to resolve our nation’s various ills if our preferred way to end a debate is through the barrel of a gun.

  10. bw Says:

    As I said before, her assent to leadership was more symbolic than anything. The oligarchy can never be eliminated and seems like EDSA was just a dress rehearsal. But I give credit to Cory for tempering the people’s minds with the concept of a kinder and gentler nation after 20 years of brutal repression. I certainly have a lot of respect for her taking the baton from her falling husband, and admired her courage and tenacity to face the overwhelming odds. Tita Cory wasn’t perfect but will be cherised forever in our memory.

  11. keith Says:

    Brother Panaderos,

    I know it is easy for people to rally around someone with hope destroying the vestiges of reason, desiring fast change. I know very little about your country. I know a bit about the frustrations.

    Still, I realize that many people are packaged for convenience to look like something they are not. Did Cory misrepresent herself? Or did she just not realize what a job was ahead of her?

    I rarely cry for anyone who dies in their late seventies, but I hope in the end, she left this planet still wanting to make a positive change in the world…

  12. emilayskie Says:

    This is the first blog about Cory Aquino that I’ve read that says something about her weakness. I admire you for posting this.

    But generally I am amazed by her genuine love for the country and her family. We will surely miss her.

  13. TruBlue Says:

    Late Prez Cory was no doubt a caring and loving mother, that’s where it ends. A most logical analogy of her presidency was: she was like one of the millions of mother who couldn’t control their kids from being thieves – that’s how her cabinets and advisers had become.

    The difference between her and Gluerilla was Cory prayed for her staff not to dwell on stealing. Gluerilla prayed her staff keep on stealing.

  14. madbong Says:

    bro, you know that I worked in the palace during her term but i share your opinions. As my colleagues and I discussed and agreed then, hers was but a transitional presidency.

Leave a Reply